home
ISSN 1076-9005
Journal of Buddhist Ethics 7 (2000)
To view the diacritics on this page, you must install the Indic Times font on your machine and have a browser capable of displaying the Unicode (utf-8) character set.

Widening the Circle:
Black Communities and Western Buddhist Convert
Sanghas
By Sharon Smith
Historical and Cultural Studies
Goldsmiths’ College, University of London

hsp01ses@gold.ac.uk

Abstract

Buddhism is one of the fastest growing religions in the West. However, so far only a small minority of those converting to Buddhism have been people of African, Caribbean, or Asian descent. This has significant implications for Buddhism in modern society, for many in the West now routinely encounter both the promise of increasing multiculturalism and the challenges from forces of racial discrimination and social exclusion. Yet there has been little exploration of these issues to date.

This literature review suggests possible causes for the present lack of ethnic diversity within Western Buddhist convert sanghas that merit further examination. It compares these sanghas’ general history with the social and religious histories of black diaspora communities in the United Kingdom and United States. It also outlines some strategies being deployed by some Western Buddhist convert sanghas to encourage further participation from black people and greater awareness of diversity issues.

Introduction

Buddhism is now one of the fastest growing religions in the West, though so far, people of African, Caribbean, and Asian descent (hereafter referred to as black people) form only a small minority of those who have chosen to convert to Buddhism. This has significant implications for Western Buddhists, both as individual practitioners and for their faith communities. Many practitioners are now based in increasingly diverse communities that face both the promises of multiculturalism and challenges from forces of racial discrimination and social exclusion. However, although there has been an increasing amount of work on Buddhist sanghas in the West, little has explored the extent to which these reflect the diversity of the population from which they are drawn.

This essay considers possible causes for the present lack of diversity within the Western sangha of convert Buddhists. Its suggestions arise from comparing the processes through which Western Buddhism has been transmitted into the West, particularly the United States and United Kingdom with the social and religious histories of black diaspora communities in these countries. It then outlines some strategies being deployed by faith communities of those who have converted to Buddhism of converted Buddhists (Western Buddhist convert sanghas) to encourage wider ethnic and cultural diversity.

Buddhism in the West—Modes of Transmission

Buddhism in the West is generally described as falling under two categories. The first is that practiced by Asian immigrants to the West and is generally described as “ethnic Buddhism.” The other is that of people indigenous to the West, predominantly European, who have converted to Buddhism. They are generally referred to as Western Buddhists, European Buddhists, or “white Buddhists” (Fields, 1998 and 1994; Tanaka, 1998).

However, this two-fold model is difficult to apply to the issue under consideration because of its assumption of two distinct and internally homogeneous groups—one largely Asian, the other predominantly European. Because of this tacit presumption, it is difficult to use this model to explore any differential impact of Buddhism on the wide range of ethnic communities within the West, particularly its long-standing diaspora communities of Africa, the Caribbean and Asia.(1) The model has also been questioned for other reasons, leading to discussions about possible alternatives (Prebish, 1999: 57–63).

An alternative three-fold model has been suggested by Nattier (Nattier, 1998), based on her understanding on how religions come to new locations and communities. She categorizes modes of transmission of new religious traditions as “import,” “export” and “baggage.”

The “import” mode is more “demand-driven.” Here an individual actively seeks the new tradition, initially encountering it through travel abroad, reading, or visits from an indigenous teacher. In the “export” mode, individuals initially encounter the tradition through missionary activities of the new group. Faith communities in the export mode therefore develop through proselytizing by the new tradition. The “baggage” mode of transmission applies where groups of immigrants start to practice their religious traditions in the new location. Here religion is seen as a means of support and of maintaining identity, with little, if any, missionary activity taking place, although outsiders may come to be part of the community through, for example, intermarriage.

Applying her typography to the situation of Buddhism in the West, Nattier, arguing that “import” Buddhism requires sufficient money and leisure time to operate as a mode of transmission, describes it as “in sum, a Buddhism of the privileged, attracting those who have the time, the inclination, and the economic opportunity to devote themselves to strenuous (and sometimes expensive) meditation training.” On this basis, she refers to it as “elite Buddhism” because “the primary common feature of this group is not its ethnicity or sectarian affiliation[,] but its class background.” She observes that “[i]n North America Buddhist groups of this type have a variety of sectarian connections, but most are affiliated with a form of Tibetan Buddhism, Vipassana or Zen” (Nattier, 1998: 189).

Sōka Gakkai is seen as the group that best falls under the category of “export Buddhism” and to have achieved a more diverse range of membership through proselytizing activity. Nattier therefore terms it and other such groups as “evangelical Buddhism.” Where others have come to the United States as immigrants, but unlike “evangelical Buddhists” not primarily for religious reasons, faith communities developed through the “baggage” traditions that they bring with them are referred to as “ethnic Buddhism.”

According to Nattier’s model, Western Buddhist convert sanghas would largely consist of elite Buddhist and evangelical Buddhist groups, and her observations, particularly those on elite Buddhism, may in part account for the low level of representation of black diaspora communities in these faith communities. However, there may also be utility in using the model further to consider the historical and social circumstances that may have affected the impact of Buddhism on black diaspora communities. These may give a greater sense of the situation from the perspective of diaspora communities of the accessibility and the relevance of Buddhism for them.

Western Buddhist Organizations and Black Communities—A Lack of Connecting Points?

In its early days in the West about 150 years ago, Buddhism initially came as a result of “the opening up of the East through colonization and the imposition of spheres of influence” (Clarke, 1997: 71). Through this, interest in Buddhism developed mainly in the upper and middle classes, with knowledge being gained primarily through translations and literary texts. From the early nineteenth century to the 1880s, no Asian Buddhists with a missionary aim visited the West (Baumann, 1996), so Buddhism in its early days was very much an “import religion.”

Buddhist sympathizers coming from a Christian background would have generally been accustomed to a more liberal, nonconformist tradition. Of those black people in the West who were Christian, the majority had come to be involved in Christianity through evangelical sections of the church that tended to be more critical of Buddhism than sympathetic to it.

Interaction between black people and Buddhist sympathizers would also have been limited by the social conditions of racism at the time. In the United States, the initial promise of the Civil War and the period of Reconstruction was followed by a bleaker period of decreasing prospects for racial harmony and justice. As Timothy Fulop observes:

The last twenty-five years of the nineteenth-century have appropriately gone down in African-American history as “the Nadir”. Disenfranchisement and Jim Crow laws clouded out any rays of hope that Reconstruction had bestowed in the American South. Darwinism and phrenology passed on new “scientific” theories of black inferiority, and the old racial stereotypes of blacks as beasts abounded in American society. The civil, political, and educational rights of black Americans were greatly curtailed, and lynching reached all-time highs in the 1890s. (Fulop, 1997: 230)

The practice of segregation extended even to religious institutions. The prevailing attitude toward race relations in the United States was described by Fannie Barrier Williams, the only woman in the small African-American delegation invited to the World’s Parliament of Religions in 1893 (Williams, 1993) in these terms:

At present there seems to be no ethical attitude in public opinion toward our colored citizens. White men and women are careless and meanly indifferent about the merits and rights of colored men and women. The white man who swears and the white man who prays are alike contemptuous about the claims of colored men. (Williams, 1993: 149)

In the United Kingdom during that period—although there was not legalized racism segregating black people from white people—an informal, yet significant, color bar did operate. This was also a period of significant racial tensions, with organized racial attacks taking place upon black communities in Cardiff and Liverpool (Fryer, 1984: 298–316).

Black people would therefore have been in the minority of the forums where interest in Buddhism initially developed. Although some Buddhist sympathizers took a progressive stance on many social issues, issues of anti-black racism in the United States and United Kingdom were not generally a focus of their attention. Tweed suggests that in America, “although Euro-American Buddhists challenged the dominant social, political[,] and economic patterns in various ways, their dissent was most fundamentally cultural” (Tweed, 1992: 88).

Similar factors were to come into play during the next significant wave of interest in Buddhism in the West during the 1960s and 1970s. The 1960s saw a new wave of interest in Eastern religions as part of the countercultures of that period (Baumann, 1996) following the activities of the “Beats” in the 1950s (Heelas, 1996: 49–50). However, those attracted to Eastern spirituality were but one of a myriad of groupings among the countercultures of the 1960s period. Some of these groupings were antipathetic to one another, having significant differences in their views about the strategies to be deployed in order to achieve social change. Paul Heelas suggests that:

one can think of the counter-culture in terms of three main orientations: that directed at changing the mainstream (for example[,] the political activists engaged in civil rights or anti-Vietnam demonstrations); that directed at rejecting mainstream disciplines to live the hedonistic life (the ‘decadent’ world of ‘Sex, drugs and rock-and-roll’); and that directed at finding ways of life which serve to nurture the authentic self (for example[,] by taking ‘the journey to the East’). (Heelas 1996: 51)

Each of these parts of the 1960s countercultures had different appeal for different ethnic groups, with black people forming only a small minority of those “rejecting mainstream disciplines” and “looking to the East for Enlightenment.” Hence once again, because of their location within society, black people formed a minority of those who were attracted to Buddhism. Futhermore, given that one of the principal ways that new religious movements spread is through word of mouth (Dawson, 1996), this would have been another factor working against the introduction of Buddhism to black communities. The effect observed for Buddhism can also be seen in other “Eastern” traditions such as Hinduism that were also gaining greater profile during the 1960s and 1970s. As in Buddhism, most of those converting have been white, middle-class individuals.

The issue of racial discrimination also gained significant profile in the 1960s with the civil rights movement and the development of black Power in the United States, the majority of black people being influenced by these movements during that time. Post-war immigrants to the United Kingdom also found themselves at the receiving end of intense racial discrimination, particularly in employment, education, and housing (Phillips and Phillips, 1998; Fryer, 1984: 372–386). Black people in the United Kingdom found themselves inspired by the anti-racist movements in the United States and sought to form similar organizations there. In both the United States and United Kingdom, black-led faith communities continued to play a key role in supporting anti-racist activity, as well as giving black people a sense of identity and other social support.

Religious Traditions of Black Communities

As well as the key role played by religious traditions in social support of black people mentioned earlier, there are other key differences with those practiced by ethnic majority people that may affect the “pushes” and “pulls” toward or away from Buddhism for black people.

For example, not only did black Christians tend to belong to different denominations from those where the critiques against Christianity were leading some to embrace Buddhism (Tweed, 1992: 92–94); they had also developed their own “creole” (Tweed, 1999) traditions that permitted expression of their original culture and their perspective on their particular historical and social situations. Such “creole” traditions were, and continue to be, significantly different from conventional Christianity (Long, 1997; Raboteau, 1995).

For black people of African descent another key factor in these “creole” traditions is what Long (Long, 1997) refers to as “the meaning of the image and historical reality of Africa.” Long also mentions how during slavery,

one was isolated from any self-determined legitimacy in the society of which one was a part and was recognized by one’s physiological characteristics. This constituted a complexity of experience revolving around the relationship between one’s physical being and one’s origins. So even if he had no conscious memory of Africa, the image of Africa played an enormous part in the religion of the black man.…Even among religious groups not strongly nationalistic the image of Africa and Ethiopia still has relevance. (Long 1997: 26)

The significance of Africa suggests that, whereas some in the 1960s counterculture would have sought out Asian religions, some black people of African descent would have been more likely to look to Africa for a sense of meaning. We can see this, for example, in the influence of Rastafarianism in the United Kingdom during the 1970s (Phillips and Phillips, 1998: 294–297).

The final key difference that may impact on “pushes” and “pulls” would be differences related to the level of religious commitment of ethnic minorities compared to the indigenous population. Findings from the Fourth National Survey of Ethnic Minorities in the United Kingdom (Modood et al, 1997) suggest that this is a key area where “minority groups manifest a cultural dynamic which is at least partly at odds with native British trends.” Though the number of regular churchgoers in Britain is decreasing, Modood et al found in their survey that nearly 20 percent of Caribbean people, a third of Indians and African-Asians, and two-thirds of Pakistani and Bangladeshi respondents—compared to 5 percent of white people—aged sixteen to thirty-four reported that religion was very important to the way in which they live their lives. The survey reported that “non-white Anglicans are three times more likely than white Anglicans to attend church weekly, and well over half of the members of black-led churches do so”; furthermore, “black-led churches are a rare growth point in contemporary Christianity.” This suggests that a significant proportion of black people of African and Asian descent are already firmly ensconced in a religious tradition.

However, the survey also observed that as many Caribbean people as white people do not have any religion and that “the general trend down the generations within every ethnic group is for younger people to be less connected to a religion than their elders (though perhaps to become more like their elders as they age)” (Modood, 1997). This would suggest that Buddhism is more likely to appeal to the younger generation of black people than to people in the older generation. But having said this, compared to black people’s “baggage” religious traditions, what current “pushes” and “pulls” arising from the way that Buddhism has developed would there be for members of these communities?

Western Buddhism and Black Communities—Issues of Cultural and Social Relevance

As mentioned earlier, Buddhism in the West has largely developed as an “import” tradition, and it is useful to consider its aspects as a religious tradition in this respect. A key influence on the development of Buddhism in the West has been the notion of individualism in terms of autonomy and self-reliance (Tweed, 1992: 130–2) that Tweed describes as

that call for mature self-regulation that echoed in the writings of Protestant reformers like Martin Luther, Enlightenment thinkers like Immanuel Kant, and Romantic writers like Emerson. It found expression in various areas of American life. It has been associated with life on the frontier. It was evident in the economic sphere…Such individualism also was expressed in the religious sphere.…This individualism…became associated with Buddhism and affirmed by a number of American promoters of the religion.” (Tweed 1992: 130)

Such notions of individualism continue to have a strong influence on the way Buddhism is approached by Westerners (Tanaka, 1998; Fronsdal, 1998; Hori, 1994), yet contrast with the ways in which people from black communities are more likely to perceive themselves. Hori, (Hori 1994) in considering the differences between “Western Buddhists” and “ethnic Buddhists,” suggests that notions of the person differ radically for “Westerners” (presumably European people) and non-Westerners, with Westerners being more likely to see the person as an autonomous individual, and non-Westerners viewing the person as “nexus of social relation.” This leads to non-Westerners’—that is, black and minority ethnic people—being more likely to see themselves in terms of their family and community relationships compared to majority ethnic people.

Such cultural differences may not be identified by those seeking to develop Buddhism in the West, meaning that their implications are often not realized. For example, in working to develop a Buddhist approach to Western psychotherapy, the assumption of a “homogeneous West” means that the considerable body of work that has been developed on black and minority ethnic people and mental health is often not taken into account.(2) This can lead to issues that are faced by a significant proportion of people in the West not receiving significant acknowledgement. Thus issues that have an impact on black and minority ethnic people’s mental health—such as discrimination and disadvantage—or that affect the way psychotherapy should best proceed if it is to be effective in such cases—such as for differences in family structure and the impact of discrimination—are ignored.

This reflects a general problem with the developing body of work on Buddhism in the West. Only recently has such work begun to consider potential differences for various ethnic communities with much essentialism and comparison of “Western Buddhism” with “Eastern Buddhism” in a way that is not only inaccurate, but also renders issues of multiculturalism and diversity invisible.(3)

The development of “engaged Buddhism” potentially would give the opportunity to address such issues, especially as many of those involved in Buddhism in America were also active in the civil rights movement of the 1960s. However, apart from the efforts of the Sōka Gakkai that will be considered in more detail later, “engaged Buddhism” is very much in its early days, and the need for a more extensive Buddhist social analysis is only starting to be realized (Rothberg, 1998; Moon, 2000). In contrast, Christian churches have many decades of experience addressing issues of racial disadvantage and discrimination, which has given rise to a considerable body of theological work and reflection.

Furthermore, many of the issues that socially engaged Buddhism has sought to respond to such as human rights, ecology, and peace are issues that have had lesser involvement from black communities compared to issues around the criminal justice system, community safety, education, access to quality healthcare and employment, and so forth. Hence, socially engaged Buddhists and members of the black community are generally unlikely to be working in the same arenas to a significant extent.

Black communities and “engaged Buddhists” are also more likely to approach similar issues from different vantage points. For example, with respect to the environment, black communities have been less involved in ecology campaigns that tend to emphasize the need for conservation that have gained relatively more attention from socially engaged Buddhists, compared to other areas of environmental concern (Rothberg, 1998; Kaza, 2000). However, black communities have been more involved in campaigns around environmental racism, for example, in cases of dumping of toxic waste in poorer localities with a high population of black residents.

Responses that have been made by Western Buddhists to racial diversity issues have tended to be the exception rather than the rule, even within the engaged Buddhist tradition. This being the case, we can now consider the forms that such recognition has taken, mainly within the United States.

Building Connections: Western Buddhism and Diversity—The Response of Sōka Gakkai

The Sōka Gakkai movement is observed to have a considerably broader band of membership (Hurst, 1998; Nattier, 1998; Wilson and Dobbelaere, 1994: 43; Tanaka, 1998; Chappell, 2000) than other Buddhist traditions. In the first study to examine diversity within Sōka Gakkai International (SGI), Chappell (Chappell, 2000) estimates from his survey of Sōka Gakkai district leaders in major cities of the United States, that the overall proportion of black people in Sōka Gakkai was almost three times that for the United States population as a whole (12.7% in the general United States population; 34.6% in the sample). Chappell concludes that “[g]iven the failure of other Buddhist groups to attract black membership, the most striking achievement of SGI-USA is its success in breaking down the color barrier.”

Chappell suggests that SGI-USA has developed this diversity by various means. In some cities, personal leadership had led to racial diversity in groups’ leadership and membership. Many also were attracted to the movement by the social support that they had received from SGI members through which “they found a practice that enabled them to improve their attitude and circumstances, that gave them a purpose that was larger than themselves, and that involved them in working with and helping others.” The diversity is also seen to result from the “aggressive evangelism” that took place during the 1960s and 1970s.

Hurst suggests that the cause of Sōka Gakkai’s appeal to minority groups is that

Soka Gakkai’s teaching of Nichiren Buddhism offers hope for individuals through accessing the power of the Gohonzon by chanting Nam-myōhō-renge-kyō. Thus minority Soka Gakkai members can experience its ethos of individual power, the freedom to change one’s life no matter what one’s circumstances, and the support of the mission for world peace. Nichiren Buddhism’s ethos is enlightened self-interest. As a practitioner improves his or her own karma and creates positive cause for positive effects, the world itself can become more peaceful and “a better place.” These are very American values experienced by minority Nichiren Buddhists in a nontraditional way. It makes sense that Nichiren Buddhism’s unusual approach to these values should be embraced by minority groups often ignored or rejected by mainstream American society. (Hurst 1998:90)

This finding of the impact of chanting encouraging people to become members is also echoed in Chappell’s study and Wilson’s and Dobbelaere’s study of SGI-UK (Wilson and Dobbelaere, 1994: 53–75).

Chappell also observes the strong, high-profile stance that SGI’s President Daisaku Ikeda has taken on issues of diversity. Though Ikeda has stated the idea of race as “pernicious,” “false,” and an “artificially constructed idea,” at the same time he has stated that “the most pressing problem facing the United States on the home front is that of racial discrimination” and has championed key figures working for the civil rights of black people, most notably Nelson Mandela and Rosa Parks. This two-fold strategy of regarding race as primarily having no significance while at the same recognizing aspects of racial discrimination and their impact in society is similar to that taken by several so-called “black churches” that see that as a term that has been ascribed to them, not as one that they would use for themselves (Kalilombe, 1998). For example, in her ethnographic study of a largely African-Caribbean Pentecostal church in Birmingham, England, Toulis (Toulis, 1997) found that members did not see their identity primarily in ethnic terms, but in the religious one of being a Christian. The predominantly black nature of the church was seen by participants to signify the need for greater evangelism within the community. Toulis suggests that the primacy given to religious identity by the Pentecostalists enabled them to address racial discrimination from the wider society. In a similar vein, Chappell found that

several Soka Gakkai members refused to give any ethnic or racial identification on the questionnaire I distributed in 1997. Others asserted that one reason they were members was because SGI-USA ignored issues of race, but affirmed the solidarity of humans as equally bodhisattvas of the earth, each with a buddha-nature. For example, one district leader who had practiced since 1972 identified her race as the “human race”, but her culture as “Black, Native American, Japanese,” and her social role as “bodhisattva,” which she claimed as central in her life. When asked for another factor important in her identity, she listed “character”. (Chappell, 2000: 196)

This suggests that black members find benefits from their membership of Sōka Gakkai similar to those obtained by members of “black churches.”

As part of its high-profile stance on diversity issues, in the United States, Sōka Gakkai has developed diversity committees that function at both national and local levels to consider minority issues and ensure that minorities have a voice within the broader movement (Aiken, 1998; Chappell, 2000). Workshops to address diversity issues from a Buddhist perspective are also conducted as part of a process of “sustained compassionate dialogue” (Aiken, 1998).

The situation with Sōka Gakkai in the United Kingdom, however, is significantly different. Though Sōka Gakkai is observed to be considerably more diverse than other Buddhist groups, there is no formal structure to consider diversity issues as such. There are, however, heritage groups for South Asians, Africans, and Caribbeans, which are organized to help new members of different ethnic backgrounds become integrated into the movement (Wilson & Dobbelaere 1994: 14–15). This approach to diversity issues echoes the general approach taken by Western Buddhists in the United Kingdom where, despite a significant level of activity around engaged Buddhism and a generally sympathetic stance around diversity issues, work is not taking place on a similar scale to that in the United States and little of this has achieved any profile (Bell, 2000).

Building Connections: Western Buddhism and Diversity Issues—Other Sanghas

Work on the links between Western Buddhism and general issues of ethnic diversity within other sanghas is very much in its infancy, most occurring during the last five years. So far, most consists of ad hoc practitioner-driven initiatives, although these are becoming more systematic. The initiatives fall under four main categories, with examples given below. Because many of these initiatives are in their early stages, only a preliminary assessment can be made.

(1) Raising awareness

These may involve public talks or articles in Buddhist publications or specific groups that seek to raise practitioners’ awareness and to encourage debate. One example is the special issue in the United States Buddhist magazine Tricycle on “Dharma, Diversity and Race” in 1994,(4) which included contributions from bell hooks (hooks, 1994) on issues for Buddhists of color practicing in the sangha and articles on the differences between ethnic Buddhism and “Western Buddhism” by Victor Hori and Rick Fields. The Buddhist Peace Fellowship (BPF) magazine Turning Wheel also recently had a special issue on this topic.(5)

The level of debate has tended to be general, with discussions focusing on practitioners’ attitudes and ways of developing greater personal awareness without more theoretical discussion taking place, although this is beginning to change. In a recent issue of Tricycle, an African-American Dzogchen practitioner, Charles Johnson (Johnson, 1999), reflects on how Martin Luther King’s vision of “beloved community” was “a sangha by another name.” He suggests that Buddhist practices could enable African-Americans to transcend “the internalized racial conflict” of what W. E. B DuBois termed “double consciousness” arising from discrimination against black people in American society. Johnson also suggests that Buddhist practices can enable all practitioners to let go of “fabricated, false sense of self positions” arising from “samsaric illusions” around race and “all the essentialist conceptions of difference that have caused so much human suffering and mischief since the eighteenth century.”

One way that awareness is being raised is through diversity workshops. Sala Steinbach (Moon, 2000), however, points out that groups may often think that one workshop is sufficient and observes that “it’s just the beginning. It’s so important to follow through.” She also observes the risk of burnout on account of being one of the few black people in a predominantly white sangha and being seen as “the authority” on diversity issues. However, she also notes the difficulties of remaining silent. Dharmacharini Muditasri, observing the assumption sanghas can make that “colour doesn’t matter” in a way that suggests whiteness as an invisible norm, makes a similar observation of the dilemmas involved for black people entering the
sangha:

Confronted with differences or conflict, a black woman is likely to have one of two responses. She can remain silent, seeming to concur with the ‘colour-blind’ approach, and avoiding standing out. Fear of acknowledging her difference, or weariness of the role of educator, is often at the bottom of this silence.…Another equally unhelpful response is the exact opposite. Here, one becomes the centre of attention by highlighting every cultural disparity, thus becoming the group’s educator on issues connected with black people.…Ideally a middle way needs to be found between these two extremes. (Muditasri, 1997: 233)

Finding such a middle way is facilitated by a sangha taking ownership of diversity issues rather than seeing them solely as the responsibilities of black people who want to become involved. One example of such good practice is the “Healing Racism in our Sanghas” group that was developed in 1998 by BPF. It operates on an ongoing basis.(6) and was formed after it was found that “[u]nfortunately, many People of Color do not feel comfortable in our Western sanghas. Too often People of Color feel isolated, exoticized and disillusioned when they find that Western Buddhist sanghas suffer from the same unconscious, institutionalized racism that American society at large suffers from.” The group states, “We proceed from the understanding that there are already People of Color who are interested in Buddhism. Our goal is not to recruit People of Color[,] but to make our sanghas more open and welcoming for people of all racial and ethnic groups who are seeking a place to practice.”

The BPF is sponsoring someone to do a year-long training and curriculum-development course on “Buddhist Unlearning Racism.” BPF also suggests—in their guidelines for BASE programs organizing social action placements—that groups discuss racism and other issues around discrimination as part of their program of activities. However, though the developing debate is welcome, it tends currently to focus on instances of racism at the micro- and small-group level. It appears that issues of institutionalized racism from larger organizations within society that have such significant impact for black people’s education, employment opportunities, social welfare, and access to criminal justice are yet to receive more detailed or thorough examination and analysis by socially engaged Buddhists.

(2) Peer support and practice groups

These serve as ongoing forums where black people or people of color can explore issues around ethnic diversity, discrimination, and disadvantage, as well as their impact as Buddhist practitioners. As well as those organized by Sōka Gakkai referred to earlier, BPF,(7) for example, has established a peer-support group for black people only called the “People of Color Sangha” group that meets monthly. One participant described it as a “watering hole,” a place where “your shoulders can come down a little bit, because you’re not the only one. This gives tremendous support for my dharma practice.”(8) This would seem to echo the point made by United States vipassanā teacher Lewis Wood when he suggested as an interim measure the creation of “a predominantly African[-]American meditative community, where Black folks can go to study and practice the dharma without having to deal with racism and Eurocentric assumptions, attitudes and behaviours” (cited in Fields, 1998:198). There are similar groups meeting in other parts of the United States, including cyber-sanghas such as the email groups for black Buddhists and Buddhists of color.(9)

(3) Outreach and targeted initiatives

These are targeted at black communities to encourage their participation and involvement in Western Buddhist convert sanghas. For example, for several years, the Friends of the Western Buddhist Order’s main center in London has organized specific events for black people who are newcomers to meditation. These are organized as part of its program of specialized events for different groups as a way of responding to particular needs that they may have, for example, lesbians and gay men. The events have had a good response, but so far the majority of those attracted have been African-Caribbean women with a minority of South Asian men. The center has now started to organize specific events for black men in order to redress the balance. It also organized a day event as a refresher for black newcomers to celebrate the African-American festival Kwanzaa last Christmas. Events for black people are currently organized at the beginner’s level in order to assist the eventual participation of those choosing to take things further in the mainstream sangha. This would appear to echo the approach taken by Sōka Gakkai in its ‘heritage groups’ mentioned earlier. In the United States, specific retreats for people of color are organized by the Spirit Rock meditation center that also provide specific scholarships for people of color to enable them to attend retreats generally. According to Sala Steinbach, these appear to have increased the number of people of color attending Spirit Rock events (Moon, 2000).

(4) Social action programs

The last category includes Buddhist social action programs in which a significant proportion of the beneficiaries is black people. Several Buddhist Alliance for Social Engagement (BASE) placements have been organized on this basis: a doctor’s service at a clinic for low-income patients; support counseling to marginalized Latina women in a community center and in a group home for severely emotionally-disturbed pregnant and mothering teenage girls; support to public schools seeking to develop initiatives around equity, diversity, and powerful learning; and the foundation of an urban community garden project. So far BPF reports a moderate level of success in this area, but it reports some difficulty in getting more diverse participation because of the currently low level of ethnic diversity in the convert sangha and lack of links between “ethnic” and “convert” sanghas.(10)

Conclusion

Several factors have been suggested as contributing towards the current low representation of black people in Western Buddhist convert sanghas, and these require further exploration. They relate firstly to black people’s awareness of Buddhist institutions and the activities that they organize. Low awareness levels may arise from black communities’ and those attracted to Buddhism not being part of the same social networks due to class, religious affiliation, and, in some cases, the impact of forces of racial segregation. This might mean that black communities have not had the same level of access to information about Buddhism as other groups in society. The significance of outreach and targeted initiatives would also be useful to identify in this respect.

In addition to access issues, the level of potential interest is important because many black people are affiliated with a wide range of prior religious traditions that provide them with social and cultural support. Interest in Buddhism among black communities may therefore be reduced even in cases such as those in which information becomes more readily available; members of black communities may be less likely to participate in Buddhist activities because of prior religious affiliation. Age may also be a factor here, with younger people more likely to become involved than first-generation immigrants. Another factor that may reduce willingness to participate is a perception among members of black communities that Buddhist activities are less accessible, particularly on the grounds that they have insufficient cultural and social relevance for them.

Research is needed to identify factors that potentially have an impact on black people’s ability to participate, particularly in Western Buddhist convert sanghas arising out of “import” traditions. Examples of such factors are the ability to pay, the quantity of available leisure time, and the effects of social pressures from racism. For example, a black person may wish to visit a Buddhist institution, but feel unable to do so because of fear of racial attack. Black people may also be deterred on account of reasonable concern that they will experience discrimination, whether direct or in the form of “residual insensitivity” (Prebish, 1999: 109) from a largely white sangha.

Finally, as mentioned earlier, Western Buddhists are increasingly practicing in multiracial and multicultural environments. Issues of racial discrimination against black people are also of critical importance, as the debates around the Rodney King and Amadou Diallo cases in the United States and the deaths of Stephen Lawrence and Ricky Reel in the United Kingdom indicate. The response developed to these issues, in terms of encouraging more diverse sanghas and developing sanghas’ capacity to respond more fully to issues of diversity and institutionalized racism in the wider community, promises to have great significance for Buddhism in the West and society at large.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Dr. Damien Keown for his helpful comments and encouragement. However, any errors are the author’s own.

Notes

  1. See, for example, Fryer (1984) for a history of British black communities since the fifteenth century; Said (1994) for a discussion of the interaction and resulting hybridity of Western and Eastern cultures following colonialism; and Phillips and Phillips (1998) for a discussion of the history of a developing black British identity. Return to text
  2. See, for example, Psychotherapy and Meditation (Kornfield, 1994: 244–253). Though the contributors to Beyond Therapy: The Impact of Eastern Religions on Psychological Theory and Practice (Claxton, 1986) note that psychotherapy has developed on the basis of Western models of the mind, they do not go on to consider what implications this has given the diversity of the West, generally approaching the issue in essentialist terms, regarding it as the interface between an “Eastern spiritual tradition” and “Western thought.” For examples of the extensive work that has considered how Western psychotherapeutic techniques can be adapted to address the needs of ethnic minorities, see Counselling the Culturally Different (Sue and Sue, 1990) and Psychotherapy for Ethnic Minorities: Issues, Context and Practice (Bhugra and Bhui, 1998). Return to text
  3. One work that is an exception to this general phenomenon in taking an ethnic profile of respondents is Coleman’s study of Buddhist groups from various traditions (Coleman, 1999). But generally, even major studies such as Wilson and Dobbelaere’s excellent survey of Sōka Gakkai in the United Kingdom (Wilson and Dobbelaere, 1994)—though asking participants for age and employment status—do not appear to take account of this issue, despite Sōka Gakkai’s uniqueness among sanghas of convert Buddhists for its diversity. Work by Hammond and Machacek on Sōka Gakkai in the United States also appears to make the same omission (Hammond and Machacek, 1999). The recent Engaged Buddhism in the West (Queen, 2000) makes a significant contribution to increasing the visibility of diversity issues within Western Buddhism. Return to text
  4. “Dharma, Diversity and Race.” Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, Vol. 4(1), Fall 1994. Return to text
  5. “Diversity in Our Sanghas.” Turning Wheel: Magazine of the Buddhist Peace Fellowship, Summer 1999. Return to text
  6. Information available from http://www.buddhismandracism.org Return to text
  7. Personal communication from Diana Winston, coordinator of Buddhist Alliance for Social Engagement (BASE). Return to text
  8. Winston, Diana. “Buddhists of Color Sangha.” In Touching Base: A Newsletter for the BASE (Buddhist Alliance for Social Engagement) Community, Fall 1999 1(3). Return to text
  9. These can be found at blackbuddhists@egroups.com and buddhists-of-color@eGroups.com respectively. Return to text
  10. Personal communication from Diana Winston, coordinator of Buddhist Alliance for Social Engagement (BASE). Return to text

References

Aiken, Bill. “Engaged Buddhism and Diversity—An American Perspective.” In Buddhism in America: Proceedings of the First Buddhism in America Conference, Tuttle Publishing, 1998. http://sgi.org/about/buddhism/aiken.html

Baumann, Martin. “Buddhism in the West: Phases, Orders and the Creation of an Integrative Buddhism.”
Internationales Asienforum 27, nos. 3–4 (1996): 345–362.

Bell, Sandra. “A Survey of Engaged Buddhism in Britain.” In Engaged Buddhism in the West, edited by Christopher S. Queen, 397–422. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2000.

Bhugra, Dinesh, and Kamaldeep Bhui. “Psychotherapy for Ethnic Minorities: Issues, Context and Practice.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 14, no. 3 (1998): 310–326.

Chappell, David W. “Racial Diversity in the Soka Gakkai.” In Engaged Buddhism in the West, edited by Christopher S. Queen, 184–217. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2000.

Clarke, J. J. Oriental Enlightenment: The Encounter Between Asian and Western Thought. London: Routledge, 1997.

Claxton, Guy, ed. Beyond Therapy: The Impact of Eastern Religions on Psychological Theory and Practice. London: Wisdom East-West, Grey Series, 1986.

Coleman, James William. “The New Buddhism: Some Empirical Findings.” In American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship, edited by Duncan Ryūken Williams and Christopher S. Queen, 91–99. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 1999.

Dawson, Lorne. “Who Joins New Religious Movements and Why: Twenty Years of Research and What We Have Learned.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 25 (1996): 141–161.

Fields, Rick. “Confessions of a White Buddhist.” Tricycle: The Buddhist Review 4, no. 1 (1994): 24–26.

____. “Divided Dharma: White Buddhists, Ethnic Buddhists and Racism.” In The Faces of Buddhism in America, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth K. Tanaka, 198–206. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. N.

Fronsdal, Gil. “Insight Meditation in the United States.” In The Faces of Buddhism in America, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth K. Tanaka, 482–495. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. N.

Fryer, Peter. Staying Power: The History of Black People in Britain. London: Pluto Press, 1984.

Fulop, Timothy E. “The Future Golden Day of the Race: Millennialism and Black Americans in the Nadir, 1877–1901.” In African-American Religion: Interpretive Essays in History and Culture, edited by Timothy E. Fulop and Albert J. Raboteau, 227–254. London: Routledge, 1997.

Hammond, Philip, and David Machacek. “Supply and Demand: The Appeal of Buddhism in America.” In
American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship, edited by Duncan Ryūken Williams and Christopher S. Queen, 100–114. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 1999.

Heelas, Paul. The New Age Movement: The Celebration of the Self and the Sacralization of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.

hooks, bell. “Waking up to Racism.” Tricycle: The Buddhist Review 4, no. 1 (1994): 42–45.

Hori, G. Victor Sogen. “Sweet-and-Sour Buddhism.” Tricycle: The Buddhist Review 4, no. 1 (1994): 48–52.

Hurst, Jane. “Nichiren Shoshu and Soka Gakkai in America: The Pioneer Spirit.” In The Faces of Buddhism in America, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth K. Tanaka, 79–97. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. N.

Johnson, Charles. “A Sangha by Another Name.” Tricycle: The Buddhist Review 9, no. 2 (1999): 43–47; 110–113.

Kalilombe, Patrick. “Black Christianity in Britain.” In Strangers and Sojourners: Religious Communities in the Diaspora, edited by Gerrie ter Haar, 173–193. Leuven: Peeters, 1998.

Kaza, Stephanie. “To Save All Beings: Buddhist Environmental Activism.” In Engaged Buddhism in the West, edited by Christopher S. Queen, 159–83. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2000.

Kornfield, Jack. A Path with Heart: A Guide through the Perils and Promises of Spiritual Life. London: Rider, 1994. N.

Long, Charles H. “Perspectives for a Study of African-American Religion in the United States.” In
African-American Religion: Interpretive Essays in History and Culture, edited by Timothy E. Fulop and Albert J. Raboteau, 21–35. London: Routledge, 1997.

Modood, Tariq. “Conclusion: Ethnic Diversity and Disadvantage.” In Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage, edited by Tariq Modood, Richard Berthoud, Jane Lakey, James Nazroo, Patten Smith, Satnam Virdee, and Sharon Beishon, 339–359. London: Policy Studies Institute, 1997.

Modood, Tariq, Richard Berthoud, Jane Lakey, James Nazroo, Patten Smith, Satnam Virdee, and Sharon Beishon, eds. Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute, 1997.

Moon, Susan. “Activist Women in American Buddhism.” In Engaged Buddhism in the West, edited by Christopher S. Queen, 246–268. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2000.

Muditasri, Dharmacharini. “Unity in Diversity: A Black Buddhist Speaks.” In The Moon and Flowers: A Woman’s Path to Enlightenment, edited by Dharmacharini Kalyanavaca, 228–242. Birmingham: Windhorse Publications, 1997.

Nattier, Jan. “Who is a Buddhist? Charting the Landscape of Buddhist America.” In The Faces of Buddhism in America, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth K. Tanaka, 183–195. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. N.

Phillips, Mike, and Trevor Phillips. Windrush: The Irresistible Rise of Rise of Multi-Racial Britain. London: Harper Collins Publishers, 1998.

Prebish, Charles S. Luminous Passage: The Practice and Study of Buddhism in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

Raboteau, Albert J. “African Americans, Exodus, and the American Israel.” In Religion and American Culture: A Reader, edited by David G. Hackett, 73–86. London: Routledge, 1995.

Rothberg, Donald. “Responding to the Cries of the World: Socially Engaged Buddhism in North America.” In The Faces of Buddhism in America, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth K. Tanaka, 266–286. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. N.

Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage, 1994.

Sue, Derald Wing, and David Sue. Counseling the Culturally Different: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.

Tanaka, Kenneth K. “Epilogue: The Colors and Contours of American Buddhism.” In The Faces of Buddhism in America, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth K. Tanaka, 287–298. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

Toulis, Nicole Rodriguez. Believing Identity: Pentecostalism and the Mediation of Jamaican Ethnicity and Gender in England. Oxford: Berg, 1997.

Tweed, Thomas A. The American Encounter with Buddhism 1844–1912: Victorian Culture and the Limits of Dissent. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992.

Tweed, Thomas. “Night-Stand Buddhists and Other Creatures: Sympathizers, Adherents, and the Study of Religion.” In American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship, edited by Duncan Ryūken Williams and Christopher S. Queen, 71–90. London: Curzon, 1999.

Williams, Fannie Barrier. “What Can Religion Do to Advance the Condition of the American Negro?” In The Dawn of Religious Pluralism: Voices from the World’s Parliament of Religions, 1893, edited by Richard Hughes Seager, 142–150. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1993.

Wilson, Bryan, and Karel Dobbelaere. A Time to Chant: The Soka Gakkai Buddhists in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.

Return to beginning of article

Copyright 2000