109. The Elder Maha-Mitta’s mother was sick with a poisoned tumor. She told her daughter, who as a bhikkhuni had also gone forth, ‘Lady, go to your brother. Tell him my trouble and bring back some medicine’. She went and told him. The Elder said ‘I do not know how to gather root medicines and such things and concoct a medicine from them. but rather I will tell you a medicine: since I went forth I have not broken [my virtue of restraint of] the sense faculties by looking at the bodily form of the opposite sex with a lustful mind. By this [40] declaration of truth may my mother get well. Go and tell the lay devotee and rub her body’. she went and told her what had happened and then did as she had been instructed. at that very moment the lay dev0tee’s tumor vanished, shrinking away like a lump of froth. She got up and uttered a cry of joy: ‘If the Fully Enlightened One were still alive why should he not stroke with his net-adorned hand the head of a bhikkhu like my son?’. So 110.
Let
another noble clansman 111. (c) As restraint of the faculties is to be undertaken by means of mindfulness, so Livelihood purification is to be undertaken by means of energy. For that is accomplished by energy, because the abandoning of wrong livelihood is effected in one who has rightly applied energy. Abandoning, therefore, unbefitting wrong search, this should be undertaken with energy by means of the right kind of search consisting in going on alms round, etc., avoiding what is of impure origin as though it were a poisonous snake, and using only requisites of pure origin. 112. Herein, for one who has not taken up the Ascetic Practices any requisites obtained from the Community, from a group of bhikkhus, or from laymen who have confidence in his special qualities of teaching the Dhamma, etc., are called ‘of pure origin’. But those obtained on alms round, etc., are of extremely pure origin. For one who has taken up the Ascetic Practices those obtained on alms round, etc., and—as long as this is in accordance with the rules of the ascetic practices—from people who have confidence in his special qualities of ascetism, are called ‘of pure origin’. And if he has got putrid urine with mixed gall nuts and ‘four sweets’31 for the purpose of curing a certain affliction, and he eats only the broken gall nuts, thinking ‘Other companions in the life of purity will eat the “four-sweets”’, his undertaking of the ascetic practices is befitting, for he is then called a bhikkhu who is supreme in the Noble Ones’ Heritages (See A. ii, 28). 113. As to the robe and the other requisites, no hint, indication, roundabout talk, or intimation, about robes and alms food is allowable for a bhikkhu who is purifying his livelihood. But a hint, indication, or roundabout talk, about a resting place is allowable for one who has not taken up the ascetic practices. [41]. 114. Herein, a ‘hint’ is when one who is getting the preparing of the ground, etc., done for the purpose of [making] a resting place is asked ‘What is being done, venerable sir? Who is having it done?’ and he replies ‘No one’; or any other such giving of hints. An ‘indication’ is saying ‘Lay follower, where do you live?’—‘In a mansion, venerable sir,’—‘But, lay follower, a mansion is not allowed for bhikkhus.’ Or any other such giving of indication. ‘Roundabout talk’ is saying ‘The resting place for the Community of Bhikkhus is crowded’; or any other such oblique talk. 115. All, however, is allowed in the case of medicine. But when the disease is cured, is it or is it not allowed to use the medicine obtained in this way? Herein, the Vinaya specialists say that he opening has been given by the Blessed One, therefore it is allowable. But the Suttanta specialists say that though there is no offence, nevertheless the livelihood 116. is sullied, therefore it is not allowable. But one who does not use hints, indications, roundabout talk, or intimation, though these are permitted by the Blessed One, and who depends only on the special qualities of fewness of wishes, etc., and makes use only of requisites obtained otherwise than by indication, etc., even when he thus risks his life, is called supreme in living in effacement, like the venerable Sariputta. 117. It seems that the venerable one was cultivating seclusion at one time, living in a certain forest with the Elder Maha-Moggallana. One day an affliction of colic arose in him, causing him great pain. In the evening the Elder Maha-Moggallana went to attend upon him. Seeing him lying down, he asked what the reason was. And then he asked ‘What used to make you better formerly, friend?’ The Elder said ‘When I was a layman, friend, my mother used to mix ghee, honey, sugar and so on, and give me rice gruel with pure milk. That used to make me better’. Then the other said ‘So bi it, friend. If either you or I have merit, perhaps 118. tomorrow we shall get some’. Now a deity who dwelt in a tree at the end of the walk overheard their conversation. [Thinking] ‘I will find rice gruel for the lord tomorrow’, he went meanwhile to the family who was supporting the Elder [42] and entered into the body of the eldest son, causing him discomfort. Then he told the assembled relatives the price of the cure: ‘If you prepare rice gruel of such a kind tomorrow for the Elder, I will set this one free’. They said ‘Even without being told by you we regularly supply the Elder’s needs’, and on the following day they prepared rice gruel of the kind needed. 119. The Elder Maha-Moggallana came in the morning and said ‘Stay here, friend, till I come back from the alms round’. Then he went into the village. Those people met him. They took his bowl, filled it with the stipulated kind of rice gruel, and gave it back to him. The Elder made as though to go, but they said ‘Eat, venerable sir, we shall give you more’. When the Elder had eaten, they gave him another bowlful. The Elder left. Bringing the alms food to the venerable Sariputta, he said ‘Here, friend Sariputta, eat’. When the Elder saw it, he thought ‘The gruel is very nice. How was it got?’, and seeing how it had been obtained, he said ‘Friend, the alms food cannot be used’. 120. Instead of thinking ‘He does not eat alms food brought be the likes of me’, the other at once took the bowl by the rim and turned it over on one side. As the rice gruel fell on the ground the Elder’s affliction vanished. From then on it did not appear again during forty-five years. 121.
Then
he said to the venerable Maha-Moggallana ‘Friend, even if one’s bowels
come out and trail on the ground, it is not fitting to eat gruel got by
verbal intimation’, and he uttered this exclamation: 122.
And
here too should be told the story of the Elder Maha-Tissa the Mango-eater
who lived at Ciragumba (see §132 below).32 So in all
respects 123. (d) And as livelihood purification is to be undertaken by means of energy, so virtue dependent on requisites is to be undertaken by means of understanding. For that is accomplished by understanding, because one who possesses understanding is able to see the advantages and the dangers in requisites. So one should abandon greed fro requisites and undertake that virtue by using requisites obtained lawfully and properly, after reviewing them with understanding in the way aforesaid. 124. Herein, reviewing is of two kinds: at the time of receiving requisites and at the time of using them. For use is blameless in one who at the time of receiving robes, etc., reviews them either as [mere] elements or as repulsive,33 and puts them aside for later use, and in one who reviews them thus at the time of using them. 125. Here is an explanation to settle the matter. There are four kinds of use: use as theft,34 use as debt, use as an inheritance, use as a master. Herein, use by one who is unvirtuous and makes use [of requisites], even sitting in the midst of the community, is called ‘use as theft’. Use without reviewing by one who is virtuous is ‘use as debt’; therefore the robe should be reviewed every time it is used, and the alms food should be reviewed every time it is used, and the alms food lump by lump. Once who cannot do this [should review it] before the meal, after the meal, in the first watch, in the middle watch, and in the last watch. If dawn breaks on him without his having reviewed it, he finds himself in the position of one who has used it as a debt. Also the resting place should be reviewed each time it is used. Recourse to mindfulness both in the accepting and the use of medicine is proper; but while this is so, though there is an offence for one who uses it without mindfulness after mindful acceptance, there is no offence for one who is mindful in using after accepting without mindfulness. 126. Purification is of four kinds: purification by the Teaching, purification by restraint, purification by search, and purification by reviewing. Herein, virtue of the Patimokkha restraint is called ‘purification by the Teaching’; [44] for that is so called because it purifies by means of teaching. Virtue of restraint of faculties is called ‘purification by restraint’; for that is so called because it purifies by means of the restraint in the mental resolution ‘I shall not do so again’. Virtue of livelihood purification is called ‘purification by search’; for that is so called because search is purified in one who abandons wrong search and gets requisites lawfully and properly. Virtue dependent on requisites is called ‘purification by reviewing’; for that is so called because it purifies by the reviewing of the mind already described. Hence it was said above (§125) ‘There is no offence for one who is mindful in using after accepting without mindfulness’. 127.
Use
of the requisites by the seven kinds of Trainers is called ‘use as an
inheritance’; For they are the Buddha’s sons, therefore they make use of
the requisites as the heirs of requisites belonging to their father. But
how then, is it the Blessed One’s requisites or the laity’s requisites
that are used? Although given by the laity, they actually belong to the
Blessed One, because it is by the Blessed One that they are permitted.
That is why it should be understood that the Blessed One’s requisites are
used. The confirmation here is in the Dhammadayada Sutta (M. Sutta 3). 128. As regards these kinds of use, use as a master and use as an inheritance are allowable for all. Use as a debt is not allowable, to say nothing of use as theft. But this use of what is reviewed by one who is virtuous is use freed from debt because it is the opposite of use as a debt or is included in use as an inheritance too. For one possessed of virtue is called a Trainer too because of possessing this training. 129.
As
regards these three kinds of use, since use as a master is best, when a
bhikkhu undertakes virtue dependent on requisites, he should aspire to that and use
them after reviewing them in the way described. And this is said:
[45] 130.
And in
connection with the fulfilling of this virtue dependent on requisites
there should be told the story of the novice Sangharakkhita the Nephew.
For he made use of requisites after reviewing, according as it is said: 131. 18. In the first pentad in the fivefold section the meaning should be understood in accordance with the virtue of those not fully admitted to the Order, and so on. For this is said in the Patisambhida: ‘(a) What is virtue consisting in limited purification? That of the training precepts for those not fully admitted to the Order: such is virtue consisting in limited purification. (b) What is virtue consisting in unlimited purification? That of the training precepts for those fully admitted to the Order: such is virtue consisting in unlimited purification. (c) What is virtue consisting in fulfilled purification? That of Magnanimous Ordinary Men devoted to profitable things, who are perfecting [the course’ that ends in Trainership, regardless of the physical body and life, having given up [attachment to’ life: such is virtue of fulfilled purification. (d) What is virtue consisting in purification not adhered to? That of the seven kinds of Trainer: such is virtue consisting in purification not adhered to. (e) What is virtue consisting in tranquillized purification? That of the Perfect One’s disciples with cankers destroyed, of the Undeclared Enlightened Ones, of the Perfect Ones, accomplished and fully enlightened: such is virtue consisting in tranquillized purification; (Ps. I, 42-3). 132.
(a) Herein, the virtue of those not
fully admitted to the Order should be understood as virtue consisting
in limited purification, because it is limited by the number ‘of
training precepts, that is, 5 or 8 or 10]. 133.
For
that venerable on never abandoned the following Good Man’s
Recollection, 134. (c) The Magnanimous Ordinary Man’s virtue, which from the time of admission to the Order is devoid even of the stain of a [wrong] thought because of its extreme purity, like a gem of pure water, like well-refined gold, becomes the proximate cause for Arahantship itself, which is why it is called consisting of fulfilled purification; like that of the Elders Sangharakkhita the Great and Sangharakkhita the Nephew. 31 ‘Four-sweets—catumadhura’: a medicinal sweet made of four ingredients. 32 The Elder
Maha-Tissa, it seems, was going on a journey during a famine, and being
tired in body and weak through lack of food and travel weariness, he lay
down at the root of a mango tree covered with fruit. There were many
fallen mangoes here and there’ (Pm. 60). ‘Though ownerless mangoes were
lying fallen on the ground near him, he would not eat them in the absence
of someone to accept them from’ (Pm.65). ‘Then a lay devotee, who was
older than he, went to the Elder, and learning of his exhaustion, gave him
mango juice to drink. Then he mounted him on his back and took him to his
home. Meanwhile the Elder admonished himself as follows:
“Nor your mother nor your father”, etc. (See §133).
And beginning the
comprehension [of formations], and augmenting insight, he realized
Arahantship after the other paths in due succession while he was still
mounted on his back’ (Pm. 60). 33 ‘”As
elements” in this way: “This robe, etc., consists merely of [the four]
elements and occurs when its conditions are present; and the person who
uses it [likewise]’. “As repulsive” in this way: Firstly perception
of repulsiveness in nutriment in the case of alms food; then as bringing
repulsiveness to mind thus: “But all these robes, etc., which are not in
themselves disgusting, become utterly disgusting on reaching this filthy
body”’ (Pm. 61). 34 ‘”Use as
theft”: use by one who is
unworthy. And the requisites are allowed by the Blessed One to one in his
own dispensation who is virtuous, not unvirtuous; and the generosity of
the givers is towards one who is virtuous, not towards one who is not,
since they expect great fruit from their actions’ (Pm. 61; cf. M. Sutta
142 and commentary). 35 The figures depend on
whether koti is taken as 1,000,000, 100,000, or 10,000. 36 ‘Comprehending
(sammasana)’ is a technical term that will become clear in Ch. XX.
In short it is inference that generalizes the ‘three characteristics’ from
one’s own directly-known experience to all possible formed experience at
all times (See S. ii, 107). Commenting on He comprehended that same
illness’ (138), Pm. says ‘He exercised insight by discerning the
feeling in the illness under the heading of the feeling [aggregate] and
the remaining material dhammas as materiality’ (Pm. 65). |